General Motors has broadened its collaboration with Redwood Materials to deliver U.S.-made battery systems for stationary energy storage, marking a pivotal shift as electricity needs surge and automotive policy changes alter the outlook for electric vehicle (EV) battery demand. Announced through a fresh memorandum, this initiative extends an ongoing alliance between the automaker and the battery innovator, underscoring the growing imperativeness of grid-scale backup and resilient infrastructure for power-hungry digital and industrial sectors.
The collaboration targets a critical inflection point in energy and transportation. Recent regulatory adjustments and market dynamics have tempered the anticipated uptake for EVs, prompting legacy manufacturers to seek new opportunities to maximize their investments in advanced cell technology. By channeling both new and repurposed cells from American manufacturing lines into large stationary power packs, the companies aim to address the exponential rise in energy consumption—especially from AI computing and data center infrastructure. These sectors, projected to absorb a significant share of domestic electricity generation by the end of the decade, are fueling demand for robust storage capabilities capable of supporting continuous, high-throughput operations and safeguarding grid resilience during spikes and outages.
Redwood’s role is multifaceted: taking second-life modules from previous automotive use and integrating them with brand-new cells to create versatile, low-cost systems for rapid deployment. These energy storage solutions, assembled entirely within the United States, will serve a dual market—backstopping the broader power grid and equipping AI data centers with emergency and load-balancing capabilities. GM’s addition of lithium-iron phosphate cell production, in parallel with current lithium-ion lines, signals a deliberate effort to diversify product portfolios and lower costs while maintaining a domestic supply chain. The choice of lithium-iron phosphate chemistry is particularly notable for stationary systems, offering longer lifespan and improved safety over repeated cycling—traits highly favorable for grid and data service providers seeking predictable, dependable battery assets.
What sets this partnership apart is the integration of both new and second-life battery assets. With energy storage becoming a foundational layer of modern power infrastructure and the proliferation of AI and digital services accelerating consumption, the ability to repurpose and redeploy legacy EV cells limits waste and prolongs value extraction from existing production investments. This approach not only conserves raw materials but also supports a circular economy by extracting further utility from cells previously dedicated to transportation, reducing the overall carbon footprint and manufacturing overhead.
Real-world deployments are already setting precedents. Repurposed modules from earlier GM vehicles are now active in substantial microgrid installations in Nevada, powering major AI infrastructure and representing some of the continent’s largest second-life battery projects. The operationalization of these projects provides a practical template for scaling similar efforts nationwide, with flexible, quick-to-deploy systems that align with utility-scale needs and fast-evolving digital infrastructure.
The strategic significance of this alliance extends far beyond short-term power needs. As the U.S. grid faces unprecedented challenges from both the electrification of transportation and the staggering computational demands of emerging technology, ecosystem players are recalibrating how and where battery assets are deployed. For manufacturers, this recalibration enables maximized returns on R&D, a hedge against unpredictable EV adoption rates, and reinforces a narrative of domestic energy independence. For project developers and grid operators, the security of supply and the technical advantages offered by diversified chemistries provide a compelling case for incorporating these modular, U.S.-built storage platforms into future capacity planning.
Critical terminology around this development includes “stationary energy storage,” referring to large-scale systems that store power for grid support or on-site backup, and “second-life batteries,” which repurpose cells originally built for vehicles into new roles after their automotive lifecycle. “Microgrid” describes a localized grid that can operate independently or in tandem with the main utility network—essential for backup and distributed energy scenarios. “Lithium-iron phosphate” and “lithium-ion” designate the chemical makeup of battery cells, each offering distinct trade-offs for longevity, safety, and power density.
While the full financial scope remains undisclosed pending future announcements, the partnership between two titans of manufacturing and recycling underscores a vital adaptation: batteries developed for the road are fast becoming instrumental to national energy security and the backbone of tomorrow’s digital economy. Through this initiative, synergies created by recycling, integration expertise, and domestic assembly stand to shape the trajectory of clean energy, supporting not only decarbonization goals but also the evolving technical needs of the world’s most advanced computing infrastructure.
%402x.svg){kind=icon}
